The Impact of Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of Counterfeit Products
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52633/jms.v3i2.65Keywords:
Counterfeit Products, Purchase Decision, Replica, Brand Image, Social InfluenceAbstract
This research paper is based on investigating the factors affecting the purchasing decision of counterfeit product consumers in the city of Karachi. The study was conducted through convenient sampling by developing a questionnaire based on behavioural as well as demographic questions. The questionnaire was circulated through the social mediums and feedback was collected to carry out statistical tests for the conclusion purpose. A total of 87 responses were received through the survey questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were conducted to deduce quantitative inferences. The findings of the study will be helpful in planning and executing the production of CF products. The study provides data related to the buying behaviour of the CF product’s consumers and the scale of sales as to how often they are sold. The study also helps focus on the need for modifications in CF products as to how much extent the consumers want modifications. This will also help the firms or brands producing CF products to launch modified versions of CF products with competitive prices, availability, and customer preferences.
References
Ahmad, N., Shamsi, A., & Hussain, S. (2016). Impact of Counterfeit Products on Consumer Buying Behavior: Empirical Investigation from Karachiites. Grassroots, 50(1).
Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2011). Counterfeits and branded products: effects of counterfeit ownership. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
Bhatia, V. (2018). Examining consumers’ attitude towards purchase of counterfeit fashion products. Journal of Indian Business Research
Cademan, A., Henriksson, R., & Nyqvist, V. (2012). The effect of counterfeit products on luxury brands: An empirical investigation from the consumer perspective.
Çekirdekci, Ş. O., & Latif, F. O. B. (2019). Users and non-users of counterfeits: motivations, emotional outcomes and neutralization processes. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
d'Astous, A., & Gargouri, E. (2001). Consumer evaluations of brand imitations. European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2), 153-167.
Eisend, M. (2019). Gender roles. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 72-80.
Khandeparkar, K., & Motiani, M. (2018). Fake-love: brand love for counterfeits. Marketing Intelligence & Planning.
Nguyen, P. V., & Tran, T. T. (2013). Modeling of determinants influence in consumer behavior towards counterfeit fashion product. Business Management Dynamics, 2(12), 12-23.
Nia, A., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2000). Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(7), 485-497.
Quoquab, F., Farzanan, S., Mohammad, J., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). Factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase counterfeit product. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(4), 837-853.
Tang, F., Tian, V. I., & Zaichkowsky, J. (2014). Understanding counterfeit consumption. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.
Tom, G., Garibaldi, B., Zeng, Y., & Pilcher, J. (1998). Consumer demand for counterfeit goods. 15(5), 405-421.
Viot, C., Le Roux, A., & Kremer, F. (2014). Attitude towards the purchase of counterfeits: Antecedents and effect on intention to purchase. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 29(2), 3-31.
Wyld, D. C. (2008). Why safeguarding the pharmaceutical supply chain from counterfeit drugs with RFID is a vital chain from counterfeit drugs with RFID is vital of the pharmaceutical industry. International Business Journal, 18(3), 206-216.
Yoo, B., & Lee, S. H. (2009). Buy genuine luxury fashion products or counterfeits? Association For Consumer Research, 36(281), 280-286.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Marketing Strategies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors retain copyright to the content of the articles published in JMS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ethical standards for publication are maintained by JMS to ensure high-quality scientific publications and public trust
in scientific findings, and that people receive credit for their work and ideas.
The Journal of Marketing Strategies (JMS) follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and adheres to its core practices.