Circular Fashion: Values, Risks, and its Effects on Purchasing Habits of Consumers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52633/jms.v5i1.363Keywords:
Sustainability, Consumer Behavior, Purchasing Habits, Perceived Risks, Circular FashionAbstract
The fashion industry is renowned for its significant environmental and social impact, prompting a growing interest in circular fashion as a potential solution. Circular fashion aims to minimize waste and maximize resource efficiency throughout the entire fashion lifecycle. As the concept gains traction, it becomes essential to investigate how consumers perceive and engage in a circular fashion, as well as the factors that influence their purchasing habits. This research article presents an in-depth exploration of the values associated with circular fashion, the perceived risks, and the effects of these factors on the purchasing habits of consumers. The study adopted a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to obtain a comprehensive understanding of consumer attitudes and behaviors. The quantitative component involves the administration of a structured questionnaire to a diverse sample of fashion consumers across different age groups and socioeconomic backgrounds. The questionnaire assesses various dimensions, including awareness and understanding of circular fashion, perceived values (e.g., sustainability, ethical production), perceived risks (e.g., limited choices, higher costs), and actual purchasing behaviors. Statistical analyses, such as regression modeling and factor analysis, were conducted to identify significant associations and patterns in the data. In the qualitative component, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subset of participants to explore their beliefs, motivations, and barriers concerning circular fashion. Thematic analysis was applied to extract recurring themes and generate rich qualitative findings. The findings shed light on factors that drive or hinder consumer engagement in a circular fashion and provide practical implications for industry stakeholders seeking to promote more sustainable practices.
References
An, J. M. (2000). A study on virtual store brand names and brand extensions of electronic commerce: Based on the customer perceived risks. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul.
Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk-taking. In Proceedings of the 43rd National Conference of the American Marketing Association, June 15, 16, 17, Chicago, Illinois, 1960. American Marketing Association.
Bianchi, C., & Birtwistle, G. (2012). Consumer clothing disposal behavior: A comparative study. International journal of consumer studies, 36(3), 335-341.
Blackwell, R.D., Miniard, P.W., Engel, J.F. (2006). Consumer Behavior, 10th ed. Thomson Southwestern: Mason, OH, USA, 2006
Cox, D. F., & Rich, S. U. (1964). Perceived risk and consumer decision-making—the case of telephone shopping. Journal of Marketing Research, 1(4), 32-39.
Hasbullah, N. N., Sulaiman, Z., & Mas’od, A. (2020). The Effect of Perceived Value on Sustainable Fashion Consumption in the Era of Covid-19: A Proposed Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(8), 895-906.
Holmes, L. (2016). New Lifestyles System Data: 2016 Global Consumer Trends Survey Results. Euromonitor International.
Horton, R. L. (1976). The structure of perceived risk: Some further progress. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 4(4), 694-706.
Kawakita, M. (2014). Perceived risk and information resources choice. J. Coll. Bus. Adm. Inf. Sci, 28, 79-98.
Kerr, J., & Landry, J. (2017). Pulse of the fashion industry. Global Fashion Agenda and The Boston Consulting Group. Executive Summary.
Kim, C. (1991). Risk perceived by consumers in apparel buying situation (I)-risk types and their relationships with consumers' demographic variables. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 15(4), 405-416.
Kim, I., Jung, H. J., & Lee, Y. (2021). Consumers’ Value and Risk Perceptions of Circular Fashion: Comparison between Secondhand, Upcycled, and Recycled Clothing. Sustainability, 13(3), 1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031208
Kim, I., Jung, H. J., & Lee, Y. (2021). Consumers’ value and risk perceptions of circular fashion: Comparison between secondhand, upcycled, and recycled clothing. Sustainability, 13(3), 1208.
Koyama, S., Namura, S., Tanaka, S., & Takagi, O. (1990). A study on the reduction strategies of perceived fashion risk by consumers. J. Jpn. Res. Assoc. Text. End-Uses, 31, 190-201.
Leal Filho, W., Ellams, D., Han, S., Tyler, D., Boiten, V. J., Paço, A., ... & Balogun, A. L. (2019). A review of the socio-economic advantages of textile recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 10-20.
Lim, K. B. (2001). The influences of risk perceptions and clothing involvements on information search behavior. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 25(2), 206-216.
Machado, M. A. D., de Almeida, S. O., Bollick, L. C., & Bragagnolo, G. (2019). Second-hand fashion market: consumer role in circular economy. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal.
Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2017). How do packaging material, color, and environmental claims influence package, brand, and product evaluations? Packaging Technology and Science, 30(11), 735-751.
Michaud, C., & Llerena, D. (2011). Green consumer behavior: an experimental analysis of willingness to pay for remanufactured products. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(6), 408-420.
Minshall, B., Winakor, G., & Swinney, J. L. (1982). Fashion preferences of males and females, risks perceived, and temporal quality of styles. Home Economics Research Journal, 10(4), 369-379.
Mittal, B., & Sheth, J. N. (2001). ValueSpace: winning the battle for market leadership: lessons from the world's most admired companies.
Mugge, R., Jockin, B., & Bocken, N. (2017). How to sell refurbished smartphones? An investigation of different customer groups and appropriate incentives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 284-296.
Musova, Z., Musa, H., Drugdova, J., Lazaroiu, G., & Alayasa, J. (2021). Consumer Attitudes Towards New Circular Models in the Fashion Industry. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(3), 111–128. https://doi. org/10.7441/joc.2021.03.07
Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(4), 189-200.
O’cass, A., & Frost, H. (2002). Status brands: examining the effects of non‐product‐related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy policy, 39(5), 2217-2227.
Park, H. H., & Choo, T. G. (2015). The influence of perceived risk of up-cycling fashion products on trust, purchase intention, and recommendation intention. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 17(2), 216-226.
Park, H. S., & Kim, H. S. (1998). A study on the dimensions of clothing attitudes. J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text, 22, 279-289.
Rausch, T. M., & Kopplin, C. S. (2021). Bridge the gap: Consumers’ purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123882.
Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56-61.
Sangroya, D., & Nayak, J. K. (2017). Factors influencing buying behavior of green energy consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 393-405.
Servera-Francés, D., & Piqueras-Tomás, L. (2019). The effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer loyalty through consumer perceived value. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 66-84.
Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I. and Gross, B.L., 1991. Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), pp.159-170.
Shimp, T. A., & Bearden, W. O. (1982). Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers' risk perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 38-46.
Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nat. News 531, 435.
Steenis, N. D., Van Herpen, E., Van Der Lans, I. A., Ligthart, T. N., & Van Trijp, H. C. (2017). Consumer response to packaging design: The role of packaging materials and graphics in sustainability perceptions and product evaluations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 286-298.
Stern, P. C., Kalof, L., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and pro-environmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(18), 1611-1636.
Stern, P. C., Kalof, L., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and pro-environmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(18), 1611-1636.
Stone, R. N., & Grønhaug, K. (1993). Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline. European Journal of Marketing, 27(3), 39-50.
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple-item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
Taylor, J. W. (1974). The role of risk in consumer behavior: A comprehensive and operational theory of risk-taking in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 54-60.
Thompson, S. C. G., & Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(2), 149-157.
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). (2018). Putting the Brakes on Fast Fashion.
Wagner, M. M., & Heinzel, T. (2020). Human perceptions of recycled textiles and circular fashion: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(24), 10599.
Woo, E., & Kim, Y. G. (2019). Consumer attitudes and buying behavior for green food products: From the aspect of green perceived value (GPV). British Food Journal.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors retain the copyright to the content of the articles published in JMS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors retain copyright to the content of the articles published in JMS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ethical standards for publication are maintained by JMS to ensure high-quality scientific publications and public trust
in scientific findings, and that people receive credit for their work and ideas.
The Journal of Marketing Strategies (JMS) follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and adheres to its core practices.