Cyberbullying Victimization: Hope for Life among Victimized University Graduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52633/jms.v3i3.102Keywords:
Social Networking Sites, Hope for Life, Bullying Victimization, Information and Communication Technology, Victimized Graduates, CyberbullyingAbstract
This research study is focused on cyber-bullying victimisation, as well as the hope of the victimized graduates to live their lives fearlessly. For this purpose, university victimised graduates were interviewed using the snowball sampling technique. The results of the study are alarming in terms of their nature and intensity –the victimized graduates were blackmailed and thinking of suicide, they were socially stigmatized, they sacrificed their lives and some surrendered or compromised with what the bully said to do. They isolated themselves and alike. The study suggested that students should avoid sharing their personal information via social networking sites with those people who are not known to them. The study also suggested that parents should keep an eye on social media accounts as well as ICTs’ devices of their children. Also, educational intuitions should organize awareness seminars to make students aware of cyber-bullying and how to escape from being victimized.
References
Abaido, G. M. (2020). Cyberbullying on social media platforms among university students in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 407-420.
Balakrishnan, V. (2018). Actions, emotional reactions, and cyberbullying–From the lens of bullies, victims, bully-victims, and bystanders among Malaysian young adults. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1190-1200.
Bork-Hüffer, T., Mahlknecht, B., & Kaufmann, K. (2021). (Cyber) Bullying in schools–when bullying stretches across cON/FFlating spaces. Children's Geographies, 19(2), 241-253.
Busetto, L., Wick, W. & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(14). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z.
Camp, N. H. (2016). Restoring trust: A grounded theory study of cyberbullying among young women (Doctoral dissertation, Loyola University Chicago).
Campbell, M., Spears, B., Slee, P., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2012). Victims’ perceptions of tradition and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates to their victimisation. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3-4), 389-401.
Capital FM (2017). Bullying top concern for parents. Capital FM (August 14). http://www.capitalfm.com/scotland/radio/news/local/bullying-top-concern-for-parents/.
Carnoy, M. (2004). ICT in education: Possibilities and challenges. Inaugural Lecture of the UOC, 2005.
Castile, H. (2013). Cyberbullying: An exploration of secondary school administrators' experiences with cyberbullying incidents in Louisiana. Lamar University-Beaumont.
Cohen-Almagor, R. (2017). Social responsibility on the Internet: Addressing the challenge of cyberbullying. Aggression and violent behavior, 39, 42-52.
Cohen-Almagor, R. (2020). Cyberbullying, Moral Responsibility, and Social Networking: Lessons from the Megan Meier Tragedy. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 16(1), 75-98.
Craig, W., Boniel-Nissim, M., King, N., Walsh, S. D., Boer, M., Donnelly, P. D., ... & Pickett, W. (2020). Social media use and cyber-bullying: a cross-national analysis of young people in 42 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), S100-S108.
Crosslin, K., & Golman, M. (2014). “Maybe you don’t want to face it”–College students’ perspectives on cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 14-20.
Cuervo, A. A. V., Martínez, E. A. C., Quintana, J. T., & Amezaga, T. R. W. (2014). Differences in types and technological means by which Mexican high school students perform cyberbullying: its relationship with traditional bullying. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 105.
Dehue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters' experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217-223.
Donegan, R. (2012). Bullying and cyberbullying: history, statistics, law, prevention, and analysis. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 3(1), 33- 42.
Dutta, P., De, C., & Chandan, A. (2017). Impact of social media on student life: A blessing or curse. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Online, 4(7), 479-486.
Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(2-3), 123-142.
Faucher, C., Jackson, M., & Cassidy, W. (2014). Cyberbullying among university students: Gendered experiences, impacts, and perspectives. Education Research International, 2014.
Goebert, D., Else, I., Matsu, C., Chung-Do, J., & Chang, J. Y. (2011). The impact of cyberbullying on substance use and mental health in a multiethnic sample. Maternal and child health journal, 15(8), 1282-1286.
Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. T. (2000). Risk factors in adolescence: The case of gambling, videogame playing, and the Internet. Journal of gambling studies, 16(2), 199-225.
Hazlyna, N. (2021). Awareness about Cyberbullying on social media among Female Students in a Malaysian Public University. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(3), 1592-1601.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of suicide research, 14(3), 206-221.
Hussain, I. (2012). A study to evaluate the social media trends among university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 639-645.
Kelly, E. V., Newton, N. C., Stapinski, L. A., Slade, T., Barrett, E. L., Conrod, P. J., & Teesson, M. (2015). Suicidality, internalizing problems and externalizing problems among adolescent bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Preventive medicine, 73, 100-105.
Kiger, M. E. & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131, Medical Teacher, DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Koranteng, F. N., Wiafe, I., & Kuada, E. (2019). An empirical study of the relationship between social networking sites and students’ engagement in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(5), 1131-1159.
Kowalski, R.M., Limber, S.P., 2013. Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J. Adolesc. Health 53, S13–S20.
Li, Q., Wang, Z., & Pustaka, A. (2015). Mobile technology and cyberbullying. In Encyclopaedia of mobile phone behavior (pp. 705-718). IGI Global.
Lindsay, B. R. (2011). Social media and disasters: Current uses, future options, and policy considerations.
Nelson, C. A. (2011a). Neural developmental and lifelong plasticity. In R. M. Lerner, F. Jacobs, & D. Wertlieb (Eds.). Handbook of applied developmental science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nixon, C. L. (2014). Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent health, medicine, and therapeutics, 5, 143.
Okumu, M., Kim, Y. K., Sanders, J. E., Makubuya, T., Small, E., & Hong, J. S. (2020). Gender-Specific Pathways between Face-to-Face and Cyberbullying Victimization, Depressive Symptoms, and Academic Performance among US Adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 13, 2205-2223.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 4(2), 148-169.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2015). Measuring Cyberbullying: Implications for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 69-74.
Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
Reid, G. M., Holt, M. K., Bowman, C. E., Espelage, D. L., & Green, J. G. (2016). Perceived social support and mental health among first-year college students with histories of bullying victimization. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(11), 3331-3341.
Schenk, A. M., & Fremouw, W. J. (2012). Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. Journal of school violence, 11(1), 21-37.
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in human behavior, 29(1), 26-32.
Speziale, H. S., Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education, 15
Sundler, A. J., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C., & Palmér, L. (2019). Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nursing Open, 6(3), 733-739.
Tokareva, E. A., Smirnova, Y. V., & Orchakova, L. G. (2019). Innovation and communication technologies: Analysis of the effectiveness of their use and implementation in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 3219-3234.
Urista, M. A., Dong, Q., & Day, K. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratification theory. Human Communication, 12(2), 215-229
Wilhelms, E., & Reyna, V. (2013). Fuzzy trace theory and medical decisions by minors: Differences in reasoning between adolescents and adults. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38, 268–282.
Wright, M. (2018). Cyberbullying victimization through social networking sites and adjustment difficulties: The role of parental mediation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(2), 1.
Zalaquett, C. P., & Chatters, S. J. (2014). Cyberbullying in college: Frequency, characteristics, and practical implications. Sage Open, 4(1), 2158244014526721.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Marketing Strategies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors retain copyright to the content of the articles published in JMS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ethical standards for publication are maintained by JMS to ensure high-quality scientific publications and public trust
in scientific findings, and that people receive credit for their work and ideas.
The Journal of Marketing Strategies (JMS) follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and adheres to its core practices.