Understanding the Role of Physical Education Teacher Training Institutions and Managerial Style in Development of Student Attitudes

Abdur Rehman; Salahuddin Khan; Salma Kausar

doi:10.52633/jemi.v3i1.55

Authors

Abdur Rehman Gomal University D. I. Khan Author
Salahuddin Khan Gomal University D. I. Khan Author
Salma Kausar Fauji Foundation College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52633/jemi.v3i1.55

Keywords:

Management Styles, Students Attitudes, Teacher Training, Educational Institutes

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand the role of physical education teacher training institutions in the development of student attitudes. Both males and females were the population of this study. The researcher therefore selected the entire population for the study due to its approachable nature. A self-constructed structured questionnaire, including the variables of the study, was developed and used by the researchers. A total of 125 questionnaires were distributed to 77 males and 48 female students, and 81 students from Gomal University and 44 from Sarhad University. 125 questionnaires were received back, which the researcher entertained in data analysis. The researcher set .05 significant level to test the formulated hypotheses. After the analysis of the collected responses, the researcher found and concluded that from the concern study, that before the training there was no difference in professional attitudes of students which enrolled in physical education training institutions (PETTI) of Gomal and Sarhad University. After training in professional attitudes of students enrolled in physical education teacher training institutions (PETTI) of Gomal and Sarhad University was found, and Gomal University have high average as compared to the Sarhad University. It means that public university are more suitable in professional attitudes for students.

References

Alexander C, (2018). A Review of Educators' Attitudes toward Handicapped Children and the Concept of Mainstreaming, Psychology in the Schools Vol: 15. Pp. 390-396.

Baumgartner T. A, & Jackson AS (2005). Measurement for Evaluation in Physical Education and Exercise Science, Fifth Edition, Wm. C. Brown Communications.

Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (2012). Policies that support professional development in the era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 81-92.

Duke, R. A., & Henninger, J. C. (2002). Teachers' verbal corrections and observers' perceptions of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(1), 75-87.

Ennis, C. D. (2011). Physical education curriculum priorities: Evidence for education and skillfulness. Quest, 63, 5–18.

Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students' motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26-36.

Hellison, D. (2011). Teaching personal and social responsibility (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Jaakkola, T., & Watt, A. (2011). Finnish physical education teachers' self-reported use and perceptions of Mosston and Ashworth's teaching styles. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30 (3), 248-262.

Salahuddin, K. (2008). Relationship among Qualifications, Experience, Gender, Professional Attitudes and Performance of Directors of Physical Education in Administration of Sports Activities in Government Colleges, PhD Dissertation, Institute of Education and Research Gomal University Dera Ismail Khan Pakistan.

Leslie Kish (2012). In Memoriam: Rensis Likert, 1903-1981. The American Statistician, Vol. 36, No. 2, Pp. 124-125.

Martua M (2005). Quality of Teaching and Learning Interaction for Mathematics Teaching: A Case Study. Retrieved from Website www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/manullang.pdf

Metzler, M. (2017). instructional models in physical education. Routledge.

Morton, K. L., Atkin, A. J., Corder, K., Suhrcke, M., & Van Sluijs, E. M. F. (2016). The school environment and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviour: A mixed‐studies systematic review. Obesity reviews, 17(2), 142-158.

Nabhania, M., O’Day Nicolas, M., & Bahous, R. (2014). Principals’ views on teachers’ professional development. Professional Development in Education, 40, 228-242.

Ness, M. K. (2016). Reading comprehension strategies in secondary content area classrooms: Teacher use of and attitudes towards reading comprehension instruction. Reading Horizons, 49(2), 5.

Neufer, P. D., Bamman, M. M., Muoio, D. M., Bouchard, C., Cooper, D. M., Goodpaster, B. H., ... & Hepple, R. T. (2015). Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of physical activity-induced health benefits. Cell metabolism, 22(1), 4-11.

Oblinger, D., Oblinger, J. L., & Lippincott, J. K. (2005). Educating the net generation. Boulder, Colo.: EDUCAUSE, c2005. 1 v.(various pagings): illustrations.

Rink, J. E., & Hall, T. J.(2008). Research on effective teaching in elementary school physical education. The Elementary School Journal, 108 (3), 207-218

Rosemary Harrison (2005). Learning and Development.CIPD Publishing. pp. 5

Thomas, J. R., Silverman, S., & Nelson, J. (2015). Research methods in physical activity, 7E. Human kinetics.

Tickle, L. (2014). Teacher induction: The way ahead. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press 16 S Chandra Alternatives Approaches and Strategies for Human Resource Development, Rawat Publications 1997. pp 2-3

Volkmann, M. J., & Anderson, M. A. (2012).Creating professional identity: Dilemmas and metaphors of a ﬁrst-year chemistry teacher. Science Education, 82(3), 293–310.

Ward, P. (2013). The role of content knowledge in conceptions of teaching effectiveness in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84, 431– 440.

Wlodkowski, R. J., & Ginsberg, M. B. (2017). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. John Wiley & Sons.