Relating Innovativeness to Customer’s Satisfaction in Public-Sector Banks: Moderating Role of Top-Management Support

Authors

  • Muhammad Faisal Sultan Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology - KASBIT, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Javed Nabi Khoso Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), USA Author
  • Shuja Ahmed Mahesar Pakistan Study Centre, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan Author
  • Baqir Husnain Higher Education Commission, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52633/jemi.v4i1.172

Keywords:

Corporate Entrepreneurship, Innovativeness, Creativity, Entrepreneurial Orientation, Customer Satisfaction, Public-Sector Banks

Abstract

In recent years, business organizations have been compelled to compete in the competitive environment and to advance innovativeness, provide improved product and service quality and respond effectively to dynamic demands and preferences. Studies on corporate entrepreneurship are now common in Pakistan. Although most of the studies tend to explore the link between corporate entrepreneurship & a firm’s growth, however, there is also a need to check the relationship of corporate entrepreneurship with other elements of growth. Therefore, this study tries to explore the effect of innovation as a part of corporate entrepreneurship on customer’s satisfaction with the reference of middle-level management of public sector banks. Data was collected through a structured questionnaire which was analyzed through SMART-PLS. The results indicate that there is a definite relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and customer satisfaction, whereas the support of top management is also a potent variable in the context of public sector banks. This study, therefore, will be beneficial for increasing understanding and theory building criteria. The empirical findings of the study also reflected that innovation is a significant predictor of customer satisfaction and moderation of top management support is significant to foster customer satisfaction. The study offers managerial implications and future research recommendations on the basis of the findings.

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Faisal Sultan, Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology - KASBIT, Karachi, Pakistan

    Assistant Professor, Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology - KASBIT, Karachi, Pakistan

  • Javed Nabi Khoso, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), USA

    Fulbright Fellow, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), USA

  • Shuja Ahmed Mahesar, Pakistan Study Centre, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan

    Professor and Director, Pakistan Study Centre, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan

  • Baqir Husnain, Higher Education Commission, Pakistan

    Division Project Manager, Human Resource Development, Higher Education Commission, Pakistan

References

Afthanorhan, W. M. A. B. W. (2014). Hierarchical component using reflective formative measurement model in partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). International Journal of Mathematics, 2(2), 33-4.

Ahmed, U., Umrani, W. A., Zaman, U., Rajput, S. M., & Aziz, T. (2020). Corporate Entrepreneurship and Business Performance: The Mediating Role of Employee Engagement. SAGE Open, 10(4), 2158244020962779

Ambad, S. N. A., & Wahab, K. A. (2016). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: evidence from Malaysian large companies. International Journal of Business and Society, 17(2), 259-280.

Andreev, P., Heart, T., Maoz, H., & Pliskin, N. (2009). Validating formative partial least squares (PLS) models: methodological review and empirical illustration. ICIS 2009 proceedings, 193.

Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 103168.

Carter, S., & Jones-Evans, D. (Eds.). (2006). Enterprise and small business: Principles, practice and policy. Pearson Education.

Cheah, J. H., Memon, M. A., Chuah, F., & Ting, H. (2018). Assessing reflective models in marketing research: A comparison between PLS and PLSC estimates. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(1), 139-160.

Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2010). A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks. Decision support systems, 49(1), 24-30.

Danişman, A., & Erkocaoğlan, E. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: a research study on İstanbul stock exchange firms. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 22(260), 80-101.

Duarte, P., & Amaro, S. (2018). Methods for modelling reflective-formative second order constructs in PLS. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 9(3), 2955-313.

Ferreira, J. (2002, June). Corporate entrepreneurship: a strategic and structural perspective. In International Council for Small Business (Vol. 47, pp. 16-19).

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.

Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. sage publications.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long range planning, 46(1-2), 1-12.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31(1), 2-24.

Hasanin, I. A. H. (2020). Investigating the Relationship Between Corporate Entrepreneurship and Customer Loyalty with Customer Satisfaction Mediating Role. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 10(4), 1-94.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New challenges to international marketing. Sinkovics, R.R. and Ghauri, P.N. (Ed.) New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing), 277-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014.

Ireland, R. D., Kuratko, D. F., & Morris, M. H. (2006). A health audit for corporate entrepreneurship: innovation at all levels: part II. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(2), 21-30.

Kanter, R. M. (1984). Change masters. innovations and Intrapreneurship in the American corporations. New York, Simon and Schuster.

Karacaoglu, K., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & San, F. B. (2013). The impact of corporate entrepreneurship on firms' financial performance: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange Firms. International Business Research, 6(1), 163-175.

Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical Research Planning and Design, New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

MacMillan, I. C., Block, Z., & Narasimha, P. S. (1984). Obstacles and Experiences in Corporate Ventures. New York University, Center for Entrepreneurial Studies.

Moghadam, S. J., & Salamzadeh, A. (2018). Do senior bankers care about entrepreneurial behaviour? case of senior managers of Iranian vanguard banks. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 14(1-2), 271-287.

Moghaddam, J. Y., Khorakian, A., & Maharati, Y. (2015). Organizational Entrepreneurship and its Impact on the Performance of Governmental Organizations in the City of Mashhad. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169(20), 75-87.

Mugenda, A. (2003). Research methods Quantitative and qualitative approaches by Mugenda. Nairobi, Kenya.

Nayyar, J. (2017). How Corporate Entrepreneurship Can Enhance Organizational Performance in Public Universities of Pakistan? International Journal of Science and Research, 6(2), 2038-2050.

Nayyar, J., & Mahmood, R. (2014). The effect of corporate entrepreneurship determinants on performance of public higher education institutions in Pakistan. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(1), 19-31.

Peters, T. J., & Waterman Jr, R. H. (1982). In Search of. Of Excellence, New York: Harper and Row.

Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring. Productivity & Management Review, 16(2), 141-152.

Quinn, J. B. (1985). Managing Innovation: Controlled Chaos. Harward Business Review, 53, 73-84.

Ravand, H., & Baghaei, P. (2016). Partial least squares structural equation modeling with R. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 21(1), 11, doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/d2fa-qv48

Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., & Bristow, A. (2015). Understanding research philosophies and approaches: Research methods for business students, (8th Edition) Pearson.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. Pearson education.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6. utg.). Harlow: Pearson.

Sebora, T. C., & Theerapatvong, T. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship: A test of external and internal influences on managers’ idea generation, risk taking, and proactiveness. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(3), 331-350.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Shaikh, S. (2020). Challenges faced by women owned micro, small and medium enterprises in an emerging economy. International Journal of Management, 11(7).

Sharma, D. J. (2017). A study on innovation in banking and its impact on customer satisfaction. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 70-74.

Sijtsma, K. (2009a). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107.

Sijtsma, K. (2009b). Over misverstandenrond Cronbachs alfa en de wenselijkheid vanalternatieven. Psycholoog, 44(11), 561.

Sileyew, K. J. (2019). Research Design and Methodology. In Text Mining-Analysis, Programming and Application. Intech Open, https://www.intechopen.com/books/cyberspace/research-design-and-methodology

Sinkovics, R. R., Richter, N. F., Ringle, C. M., & Schlägel, C. (2016). A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research. International marketing review, 33(3), 376-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2014-014

State Bank of Pakistan (n.d.). retrieved from https://www.sbp.org.pk

Umrani, W. A., Kura, K. M., & Ahmed, U. (2018). Corporate entrepreneurship and business performance. PSU Research Review, 2(1), 59-80.

Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., & Andriukaitienė, R. (2018). Philosophy and paradigm of scientific research. Management Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility, 121.

Published

30-01-2022

How to Cite

Relating Innovativeness to Customer’s Satisfaction in Public-Sector Banks: Moderating Role of Top-Management Support (M. F. Sultan, J. N. Khoso, S. A. Mahesar, & B. Husnain , Trans.). (2022). Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 4(1), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.52633/jemi.v4i1.172

Share