Measuring the Level of Automation and its Impact on Organizational Performance and Employees’ Job Performance

Authors

  • Muhubullah Abbasi University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan. Author
  • Syed Abdul Sattar Shah University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan. Author
  • Farhan Zeb Khaskhelly University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52633/jemi.v5i4.337

Keywords:

Levels of Automation, Dynamo Reference Scale, Importance-Performance Map Analysis (IPMA), Organizational Performance, Employees Job Performance

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to propose the methodology for the measurement of levels of automation with the help of a dynamo reference scale for dynamic levels of automation and to find its relationship with organizational performance, and employee job performance while bifurcating the tasks performed by human and machine. The present research employs quantitative analysis to find out the hypothetical relationship between levels of automation, organizational performance, and employee job performance. The data was collected from managers and employees working directly with machinery involved in production, particularly the Kotri textile mill. The hypotheses testing suggests that the proposed model achieved an acceptable fit with the data (i.e., out of 7 hypotheses, 6 hypotheses were significantly accepted). The study has limitations in generalization, in terms of the survey questionnaire, and the targeted audience (employees of the firms & managers of the concerned department) of textile mills of the Kotri industrial zone. This is the first research that contributes to the methodology in business studies for measuring levels of automation by employing a dynamo reference scale for levels of automation from industrial engineering which is a new concept in business studies. Secondly, this research provides insight into how organizations are performing at optimal levels with the help of machinery with only a minimal number of employees. Finally, future research strongly suggests implementing the methodology for measurement of automation coupled with business research methods in other industries to understand their level of automation and task performance by employees and machinery as this may bring about interesting possible outcomes.

Author Biographies

  • Muhubullah Abbasi, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan.

    Ph.D. Scholar, IBA, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan.

  • Syed Abdul Sattar Shah, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan.

    Pro-Vice Chancellor, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan.

  • Farhan Zeb Khaskhelly, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan.

    Assistant Professor, IBA, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan.

References

Abbah, M. T. (2014). Employee motivation: The key to effective organizational management in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(4), 01-08.

Agha, S., Alrubaiee, L., & Jamhour, M. (2012). Effect of core competence on competitive advantage and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and management, 7(1), 192.

Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2017). What to expect from artificial intelligence. Sloan Management Review, Feb 7, 2017.

Ahmad Sirohey, S., Hunjra, A. I., & Khalid, B. (2012). Impact of Business Process Automation on Employees’ Efficiency. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 1(1), 1-12.

Allum, A. (1998). Automation requirement matching through TMC. Assembly Automation, 18(2), 107-111.

Anderson, R. J. (1996, April). Autonomous, teleoperated, and shared control of robot systems. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Vol. 3, pp. 2025-2032). IEEE.

Balfe, N., Sharples, S., & Wilson, J. R. (2018). Understanding is key: An analysis of factors about trust in a real-world automation system. Human factors, 60(4), 477-495.

Camara, A., Rahim, M. Z. B. A., Yusof, Y. B., Tambi, A. M. B. A., & Magassouba, S. M. (2019). The effect of automation and workload on staff productivity in under developing country in Guinea: A conceptual study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(3), 902-914.

Choe, P., & Schumacher, D. (2015). Influence of different types of vibrations on technical acceptance of a mobile game aiming for hedonic satisfaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(1), 33-43.

Choe, P., Tew, J. D., & Tong, S. (2015). Effect of cognitive automation in a material handling system on manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 891-899.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. pearson.

Dimnik, T. P., & Johnston, D. A. (1993). Manufacturing managers and the adoption of advanced manufacturing technology. Omega, 21(2), 155-162.

Frohm, J., Granell, V., Stahre, J., & Winroth, M. (2007). Shifting focus for Levels of Automation in Manufacturing Systems. working paper.

Greenwood, R. G. (1996). Leadership theory: A historical look at its evolution. Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 3-16.

Hahn, E. D., & Ang, S. H. (2017). From the editors: New directions in the reporting of statistical results in the Journal of World Business. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 125-126.

Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2006). Design-based research in science education: One step towards methodology. Nordic studies in science education, 2(2), 54-68.

Kaber, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 5(2), 113-153.

Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60.

Mangan, J., Lalwani, C., & Gardner, B. (2004). Combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies in logistics research. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 34(7), 565-578.

Parasuraman, R., Barnes, M., Cosenzo, K., & Mulgund, S. (2007). Adaptive automation for human-robot teaming in future command and control systems. The International C2 Journal, 1(2), 43-68.

Parry, E., & Battista, V. (2023). The impact of emerging technologies on work: a review of the evidence and implications for the human resource function. Emerald Open Research, 1(4).

Parthasarathy, N., & Sethi, P. (1997). Trees and liana species diversity and population structure in a tropical dry evergreen forest in south India. Tropical Ecology, 38.

Peeters, M. C., & Plomp, J. (2022). For better or for worse: The impact of workplace automation on work characteristics and employee well-being. In Digital Transformation-Towards New Frontiers and Business Opportunities. IntechOpen.

Rahim, S. H. (2010). Emotional intelligence and stress: An analytical study of Pakistani banks. International Journal of Trade, Economics, and Finance, 1(2), 194–199.

Shaukat, M., & Zafarullah, M. (2009). Impact of information technology on organizational performance: An analysis of qualitative performance indicators of Pakistan’s banking and manufacturing companies. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 16(1), 36-49.

Winroth, M., Säfsten, K., Stahre, J., Granell, V., & Frohm, J. (2007, August). Strategic automation—refinement of classical manufacturing strategy. In Proceedings of the Swedish Production Symposium.

Wong, P. K., & Ngin, P. M. (1997). Automation and organizational performance: The case of electronics manufacturing firms in Singapore. International Journal of Production Economics, 52(3), 257-268.

Zammuto, R. F., & O’Connor, E. J. (2018). Gaining Advanced Manufacturing Technologies’benefits: The Roles of Organization Design and Culture. In Organizational Innovation (pp. 165-192). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2023

How to Cite

Measuring the Level of Automation and its Impact on Organizational Performance and Employees’ Job Performance (M. . Abbasi, S. A. S. Shah, & F. Z. Khaskhelly , Trans.). (2023). Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 5(4), 601-621. https://doi.org/10.52633/jemi.v5i4.337

Share