Enhancing Supply Chain Efficiency: Exploring the Mediating Role of Perceived Usefulness in Blockchain-Enabled Collaboration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52633/jemi.v5i3.310Keywords:
Supply Chain Collaboration, Intention to Use Blockchain, Perceived Usefulness, Textile IndustryAbstract
This study aims to examine the mediating role perceived usefulness between supply chain collaboration and the intention to use blockchain in the textile industry of Pakistan. A cross-sectional method is conducted, and data is gathered with the help of the adopted questionnaire from previous studies. The HR department of the concerned firm is requested to circulate the printed questionnaire among middle-level employees of the firm. A total of 240 cases are considered in this study. Five Likert scales, from strongly disagree to agree strongly, are considered to test the suggested hypotheses based on previous studies. The findings of this study confirmed the direct effect of supply chain collaboration on the intention to use the blockchain and the partial mediation effect of perceived usefulness is revealed. There are few studies on supply chain collaboration, blockchain use, and perceived usefulness in developing countries like Pakistan's textile industry, especially among middle-level employees. Existing scholarship ignores emerging countries' textile sectors and extends results to other industries. The insights also help managers create blockchain-integrated supply chain strategies. Blockchain technology may be maximized via technology providers and industry-wide cooperation. These practical consequences may improve developing nations' textile supply chains' efficiency, transparency, and competitiveness. The insights also help managers create blockchain-integrated supply chain strategies. Blockchain technology may be maximized via technology providers and industry-wide cooperation.
References
Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of TAM's most used external variables on students' Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in Human Behaviour, 63, 75-90.
Adow, A. H., Shrivas, M. K., Mahdi, H. F., Zahra, M. M. A., Verma, D., Doohan, N. V., & Jalali, A. (2022). Analysis of Agriculture and Food Supply Chain through Blockchain and IoT with Light Weight Cluster Head. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022.
Aldammagh, Z., Abdeljawad, R., & Obaid, T. (2021). Predicting mobile banking adoption: Integrating TAM and TPB with trust and perceived risk. Financial Internet Quarterly, 17(3), 35-46.
Baah, C., Acquah, I. S. K., & Ofori, D. (2022). Exploring the influence of supply chain collaboration on supply chain visibility, stakeholder trust, environmental and financial performances: a partial least square approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(1), 172-193.
Barati, M., Taheri-Kharameh, Z., Farghadani, Z., & Rásky, É. (2019). Validity and reliability evaluation of the Persian version of the heart failure-specific health literacy scale. International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery, 7(3), 222.
Cai, C., Hao, X., Wang, K., & Dong, X. (2023). The Impact of Perceived Benefits on Blockchain Adoption in Supply Chain Management. Sustainability, 15(8), 6634.
Chen, W., Botchie, D., Braganza, A., & Han, H. (2022). A transaction cost perspective on blockchain governance in global value chains. Strategic Change, 31(1), 75–87.
Chowdhury, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Dey, P., & Budhwar, P. (2022). Blockchain technology adoption for managing risks in operations and supply chain management: evidence from the UK. Annals of operations research, pp. 1-36.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205-219.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Bryde, D. J., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020). Blockchain technology for enhancing swift trust, collaboration, and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), 3381-3398.
Ekman, A. (2021). China’s blockchain and cryptocurrency ambitions. BRIEF. European Union Institute for Security Studies, 15, 1-8.
Fernando, Y., Zainul Abideen, A., & Shaharudin, M. S. (2020). The nexus of information sharing, technology capability, and inventory efficiency. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 33(4), 327-351.
Garcia-Torres, S., Rey-Garcia, M., Sáenz, J., & Seuring, S. (2022). Traceability and transparency for sustainable fashion-apparel supply chains. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 26(2), 344-364.
Gökalp, E., Gökalp, M. O., & Çoban, S. (2022). Blockchain-based supply chain management: understanding the determinants of adoption in the context of organizations. Information systems management, 39(2), 100-121.
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Janssen, M., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2019). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and user acceptance of blockchain technology for digital transactions–insights from user-generated content on Twitter. Enterprise Information Systems, 13(6), 771-800.
Hader, M., Tchoffa, D., El Mhamedi, A., Ghodous, P., Dolgui, A., & Abouabdellah, A. (2022). Applying integrated Blockchain and Big Data technologies to improve supply chain traceability and information sharing in the textile sector. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 28, 100345.
Härting, R. C., Sprengel, A., Wottle, K., & Rettenmaier, J. (2020). Potentials of blockchain technologies in supply chain management-A conceptual model. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 1950-1959.
Hastig, G. M., & Sodhi, M. S. (2020). Blockchain for supply chain traceability: Business requirements and critical success factors. Production and Operations Management, 29(4), 935-954.
Hite, L. M., & McDonald, K. S. (2020). Careers after COVID-19: Challenges and changes. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 427-437.
Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Misra, S. K., Rana, N. P., Raghavan, V., & Akella, V. (2019). Blockchain research, practice, and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 114-129.
Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019). New disruption risk management perspectives in supply chains: Digital twins, the ripple effect, and resileanness. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 337-342.
Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Arha, H. (2019). Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2009-2033.
Khan, S., Kaushik, M. K., Kumar, R., & Khan, W. (2023). Investigating the barriers of blockchain technology integrated food supply chain: a BWM approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(3), 713-735.
Kramer, M. P., Bitsch, L., & Hanf, J. (2021). Blockchain and its impacts on agri-food supply chain network management. Sustainability, 13(4), 2168.
Kumar, A., Srivastava, S. K., & Singh, S. (2022). How blockchain technology can be a sustainable infrastructure for the agrifood supply chain in developing countries. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing.
Liu, W., Liu, X., Shi, X., Hou, J., Shi, V., & Dong, J. (2023). Collaborative adoption of blockchain technology: A supply chain contract perspective. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10(1), 121-142.
Lohmer, J., Bugert, N., & Lasch, R. (2020). Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study. International journal of production economics, 228, 107882.
Min, S., Zacharia, Z. G., & Smith, C. D. (2019). Defining supply chain management: in the past, present, and future. Journal of business logistics, 40(1), 44-55.
Munir, M., Jajja, M. S. S., Chatha, K. A., & Farooq, S. (2020). Supply chain risk management and operational performance: The enabling role of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107667.
Mustafa, S., Zhang, W., Sohail, M. T., Rana, S., & Long, Y. (2023). A moderated mediation model to predict the adoption intention of renewable wind energy in developing countries. Plos one, 18(3), e0281963.
Nandi, M. L., Nandi, S., Moya, H., & Kaynak, H. (2020). Blockchain technology-enabled supply chain systems and supply chain performance: a resource-based view. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(6), 841-862.
Nasution, M. I., Fahmi, M., & Prayogi, M. A. (2020). The quality of small and medium enterprises performance using the structural equation model-part least square (SEM-PLS). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1477, No. 5, p. 052052). IOP Publishing.
Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial management & data systems, 116(9), 1849-1864.
Pal, K. (2020). Internet of things and blockchain technology in apparel manufacturing supply chain data management. Procedia Computer Science, 170, 450-457.
Park, A., & Li, H. (2021). The effect of blockchain technology on supply chain sustainability performances. Sustainability, 13(4), 1726.
Philsoophian, M., Akhavan, P., & Namvar, M. (2022). The mediating role of blockchain technology in the improvement of knowledge sharing for supply chain management. Management Decision, 60(3), 784-805.
Prakash, C., Roy, V., & Charan, P. (2022). Mitigating inter-organizational conflicts in humanitarian logistics collaboration: the roles of contractual agreements, trust, and post-disaster environmental uncertainty phases. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(1), 28-52.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Rajasekaran, A. S., Azees, M., & Al-Turjman, F. (2022). A comprehensive survey on blockchain technology. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52, 102039.
Rashid, A. (2020). Structural equation modeling.
Rogerson, M., & Parry, G. C. (2020). Blockchain: case studies in food supply chain visibility. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(5), 601-614.
Sciarelli, M., Prisco, A., Gheith, M. H., & Muto, V. (2022). Factors affecting the adoption of blockchain technology in innovative Italian companies: an extended TAM approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(3), 495-507.
Selimović, J., Pilav-Velić, A., & Krndžija, L. (2021). Digital workplace transformation in the financial service sector: Investigating the relationship between employees' expectations and intentions. Technology in Society, 66, 101640.
Shrestha, A. K., Vassileva, J., Joshi, S., & Just, J. (2021). Augmenting the technology acceptance model with the trust model for the initial adoption of a blockchain-based system. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e502.
Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4-11.
Song, H., Ruan, W. J., & Jeon, Y. J. J. (2021). An integrated approach to the purchase decision making process of food-delivery apps: Focusing on the TAM and AIDA models. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95, 102943.
Stern, H. S., Cuellar, M., & Kaye, D. (2019). Reliability and validity of forensic science evidence. Significance, 16(2), 21-24.
Sunmola, F. T., Burgess, P., & Tan, A. (2021). Building blocks for blockchain adoption in digital transformation of sustainable supply chains. Procedia Manufacturing, 55, 513-520.
Sürücü, L., & MASLAKÇI, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694-2726.
Taherdoost, H. (2022). A critical review of blockchain acceptance models—blockchain technology adoption frameworks and applications. Computers, 11(2), 24.
Teodorescu, M., & Korchagina, E. (2021). Applying blockchain in the modern supply chain management: Its implication on open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 80.
Vahdat, A., Alizadeh, A., Quach, S., & Hamelin, N. (2021). Would you like to shop via mobile app technology? The technology acceptance model, social factors, and purchase intention. Australasian Marketing Journal, 29(2), 187-197.
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65-S71.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.